Is potuz's mini payload design an alternative to quick slots, or only a complement?

Protocol design · 4 participants · 8 quotes · 2026-09-19 ~ 2026-09-20

potuz put forward a design that reveals several payloads sequentially within one slot to reduce inclusion latency, as an alternative to quick slots, and Barnabé Monnot countered that this is a weak preconf and cannot replace the confirmation guarantee quick slots provide, so it is a complement, not an alternative. terence Tsao summarized that the benefits are clear but that loss of fast finality and implementation complexity are the tradeoffs.

Background

Quick slots are a Hegotá fork candidate proposal that shortens slot time to make transaction inclusion and confirmation faster. potuz's alternative keeps slot time unchanged and reduces inclusion latency by sequentially revealing independent, individually complete payloads within one slot. With Gloas, the maximum inclusion latency is 18 seconds, and potuz calculates that adding only a PTC (Payload Timeliness Committee) bitlist can cut it to 8 seconds. An ahead-of-time auction is a method where a sequencer auctions the inclusion order before a set slot, and potuz opposes introducing it on L1, citing Arbitrum's Timeboost as an example.

Why it matters

As quick slots are discussed as a Hegotá fork candidate, the landscape of alternatives was laid out concretely for the first time, covering what to sacrifice and what to speed up. The tradeoff between fast finality and low inclusion latency, and whether to introduce an ahead-of-time auction on L1, are issues for later core developer calls.

Key points

For — It can be an alternative to quick slots

Potuz

Against — It is a complement, not an alternative

Barnabé Monnot | barnabé.eth

Neutral — The benefits are clear, but there are tradeoffs

terence

Other — The root problem is the definition of censorship resistance

dataalways ⚡️🤖

← Debates