Is privacy dead on Ethereum?

Protocol design · 9 participants · 9 quotes · 2026-09-19 ~ 2026-09-20

When gakonst said that his main concern is how dead privacy will be going forward, pcaversaccio pushed back that privacy is not dead and that we have only been building the wrong defaults, and that unconditional privacy enshrined in L1 should be deployed. The discussion split between those who say privacy is a lost cause in the age of AI and those who say it is an endless arms race that neither side wins.

Background

This debate extends the old question of whether privacy should be enshrined by default in the Ethereum protocol rather than being an individual feature. pcaversaccio has argued for years for unconditional privacy enshrined in L1, meaning that the default transaction itself is private. In the background, the ZEC (Zcash) rally and advances in AI-based chain analysis have raised doubts about how effective privacy technology really is.

Why it matters

Privacy is not just a debate about an individual feature but is becoming a touchstone for whether Ethereum is losing ground in the privacy narrative. The points to watch are whether unconditional privacy on L1 will be deployed as the default and what its timeline will be.

Key points

For — Privacy is dying

Georgios Konstantopoulos, Maya Zehavi

Against — It is not dead, we have only been building the wrong defaults

vitalik.eth, sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /, Privacy Pools, Web3Privacy Now, chase

Neutral — It is an eternal arms race that neither side wins

𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤 𝕝𝕒 𝕃𝕦𝕟𝕖, Fran ~ priv/acc

← Debates